Reactions to the Threat of BSE and Salmonella.
Potts, H. W. W.  

References:

Butler, G. & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51-62.

Crowne, D. & Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence. Wiley, New York.

Eysenck, H. & Eysenck, S. (1975). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Hodder & Stoughton, London.

Eysenck, M., MacLeod, C. & Mathews, A. (1987). Cognitive functioning in anxiety. Psychological Research, 49, 189-195.

Eysenck, M., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A. & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(2), 144-150.

Fallon, A. E. & Rozin, P. (1983). The psychological bases of food rejections by humans. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 13, 15-26.

Mathews, A. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 455-468.

Mogg, K., Glenwright, J. & Kentish, J. (1990). Interpretation of Homophones Related to Threat: Trait versus State Anxiety or Response Bias Effects? Unpublished paper*.

Mogg, K., Potts, H. W. W., Miller, T. & Bradley, B. (1991). Unpublished data*.

Pliner, P. & Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19, 105-120.

Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of a reliable and valid short form of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.

Rozin, P. & Fallon, A. (1980). The psychological categorization of foods and non-foods: a preliminary taxonomy of food rejections. Appetite, 1, 193-201.

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R. & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the Sate-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
 

*Mogg et al. (1990) and Mogg et al. (1991) have now been published as:

Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Miller, T., Potts, H., Glenwright, J. & Kentish, J. (1994). Interpretation of homophones related to threat: Anxiety or response bias effects? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18(5), 461-477.


Return to abstract